Openoffice is released on windows, linux and macos, with. Fsfs free software and osis opensource licenses together are called foss licenses. Files licensed under the cddl can be combined with files licensed under other licenses, whether open source or proprietary. For software licensed under the apache license version 2. Even better, for a substantial program, use the apache 2. It grants the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, andor sell copies of the software as long as these and permission notices are included in every copy or version of the product. Software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula youtube. It allows users to use the software for any purpose, to distribute it, to modify it, and to distribute modified versions of the software under the terms of the license, without concern for royalties. First of all, it is important to note that upgrading is a choice. If you do not see any interesting projects from the proposed ideas, we encourage you to contact one of the apache projects mailing list and propose a new idea. No, the licenses are not compatible as already outlined in the replies and one of the main differences is that the apache license grants the patent rights together with the code unlike cc licenses. This article explains why upgrading the license is important. Software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula duration. Top 10 apache license questions answered whitesource.
I can include mitlicensed code in a gpllicensed product, but can i include gpllicensed code in a mitlicensed product. How should i apply the apache license to my own software. The licenses are incompatible in one direction only, and it is a result of asfs licensing. The licenses are incompatible in one direction only, and it is a result of asfs licensing philosophy and the gplv3 authors interpretation of law.
He explains how businesses, because of proprietary concerns, avoid software created under opensource licenses that require all derivative work be published for the sake of engaging more. Yet, many foss licenses, like the apache license, and all free software licenses allow commercial use of foss components. Mit license is one of the least restrictive open source licenses out there. Apache licensing and distribution faq apache software. The question seems to be whether there is a licensing problem in richfaces because, while much of the code is specifically licensed under lgpl version 2. The terms state that users cant remove existing, patent, trademarks and attribution notices. And if youre not making available a competing saas product as described in the exclusion, you can use 5. Free software license provider mit license, apache license 2019 apache license the apache software foundation asf is a nonprofit corporation to support apache software projects. Apache licenses welcome to the apache software foundation. It identifies the acceptable licenses for inclusion of thirdparty open source components in apache software foundation products. The writers of the license maintain it is free software, but the free software foundation says it is not free because it infringes the socalled zero freedom of the gpl, that is, the freedom to use the software for any purpose. At the 5th gplv3 conference, richard stallman was recorded saying.
Version 3 of the gnu general public license gnu gpl has been released, enabling free software packages to upgrade from gpl version 2. The difference between the gpl and the lgpl is that with the lgpl, the entire work doesnt have to have the same license. Subject to the terms and conditions of this license, each contributor hereby grants to you a perpetual, worldwide, nonexclusive, nocharge, royaltyfree, irrevocable except as stated in this section patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the work, where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by such contributor that are necessarily. The apache software foundation uses various licenses to distribute software and documentation, to accept regular contributions from individuals and corporations, and to accept larger grants of existing software products. Subject to the terms and conditions of this license, each contributor hereby grants to you a perpetual, worldwide, nonexclusive, nocharge, royaltyfree, irrevocable except as stated in this section patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the work, where such license applies only to those. What is the difference between a bsd and a gpl license. Let us examine why these corporations stay away from gpl and favor the apache license. My current situation is that i am developing an application that is made from a gpl v3 licensed programming language.
This would be incompatible with asfs requirement that all apache software must be distributed under the apache license 2. What is the difference between open source licenses mit. Unlike the apache license, the gpl embeds the decision as to the codes open source nature into the code itself. Linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration. The gpl is by far the best software license for endusers of the code. Software licenses in plain english lookup popular software licenses summarized ataglance. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the provenance and openness of the software. All packages produced by the asf are implicitly licensed under the apache license, version 2. Vertrigo is a freeware compilation of free software under gpl, apache license.
Bsd license is a part of a family of free software licenses that have much fewer restrictions in distribution as compared to other free software licenses. Compatible, ie that gpl3 software can link too apl software, is new gpl2 code wasnt able to link toinclude apache licensed code, is new. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project free. A brief comparison of the license features is listed in wiki. Why corporations favors the apache license over the gpllgpl. See the gnu general public license for more details. Apache lucene is a free and opensource search engine software library, originally written completely in java by doug cutting. What is the license apache camel apache software foundation.
It considers free software permissive license group to be a reference implementation of a free software license. The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to none unlicense. It seems to me that the chief difference between the mit license and gpl is that the mit doesnt require modifications be open sourced whereas the. Non software enterprises like banks or states and folk like your dad benefit a lot from gpl license. I can take program a and use it, read the source, modify it e. Gpl, lgpl, apache, bsd, the great thing about open source code is the large amount of high quality code that is available and many embedded projects use foss code as it really speeds up development time. Why upgrade to gplv3 gnu project free software foundation.
Note that you can search the issue tracker for gsoc projects by filtering using the gsoc2020 label, this allows you to narrow down the list to the projects you are interested in. You can freely use, modify, distribute and sell a software licensed under the apache license without worrying about the use of software. It basically says that anyone can do whatever they want with the licensed material, as long as its accompanied by the license. This product includes software developed by the eclipse software foundation under the eclipse public license 1. The content on this website, of which is the author, is licensed under a creative commons attribution 4. What is the difference between gpl, agpl and lgpl licenses. Sluc is a software license published in spain in december 2006 to allow all but military use.
Let say a software developer uses a library for android phones to make a game, and then makes a patent claim in an attempt to extort license fees from other users wishing to make games using the same library. Under gpl you cant sub license, meaning, you cant cha. The gnu lgpl is very popular among independent developers and companies which mainly deals with open source software. Asfs objective is to provide legal protection to volunteers working on the apache project and to protect the apache brand name from being used by other organization. The two licenses are very different from each other. In contrast to lgpl, gpl requires that you provide the code for all changes made to the software.
The gnulgpl is very popular among independent developers and companies which mainly deal with open source software. An update to the fsfs list of free software licenses lists the new apache license, version 2. May i reuse and modify the asf contributor license agreements clas for my own purposes. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses. The asf and its projects release their software products under the apache license. Apache 2 software can therefore be included in gplv3 projects, because the gplv3 license accepts our software into gplv3 works.
Gpl, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the gpl too. The text should be enclosed in the appropriate comment syntax for the file format. And of course, our new release doesnt affect the licensing for apache kafka at all. It is important to note that there are no files in the richfaces source that individually contain both apache.
Kafka is an apache software foundation project, and therefore remains under the apache 2. Apache openoffice is the free and open productivity suite from the apache software foundation apache openoffice features six personal productivity applications. The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to. If the software developer did this, they would immediately lose their right to use the library under the apache license. Which open source software licenses to use and why. What are the real life implications for an apache 2 license. Its also arguable whether the licenses mentioned other than apache have an implicit patent grant. Osi agrees with fsf on all widely used free software licenses, but differ from fsfs list, as it approves against the open source definition rather than the free software definition.
Previous versions of the sgi free software license b were not free software licenses, despite their name. Here is a nice and brief overview of the apache license 2. In the case of apache openoffice, this license is the apache software license 2. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project. Vertrigoserv is a complete free wamp server allowing php development for windows. Apache license spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance category. Nov 08, 2015 linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration. Come and join us in helping apache openoffice to thrive. Tldrlegal provides generally good summaries of licenses. Is creativecommons license compatible with apache license. To apply the apache license to your work, attach the following boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets replaced with your own identifying information.
See the apache license for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the apache license. May 31, 2012 the licenses seen most often are the following. This product includes software developed by the apache software foundation licensed under the apache license version 2. Agpl is a fairly new license that was meant to go gplovernetworks. Difference between different types of open sources licenses. Open source license compatibility gplv3 and apache 2.
Visit to learn how were building healthy and resilient communities. Of these licenses, the apache license is seen pretty infrequently outside of apache software foundation software. There are licenses accepted by the osi which are not free as per the free software definition. The common development and distribution license cddl is a free and opensource software license, produced by sun microsystems, based on the mozilla public license mpl. The real story is that hard work has been done to make the gpl3 compatible with the apache license 2 or apl v2, asf is the apache software foundation and not a license. In our previous blog post you could read about open source software and why it is important to add a software license to your software. What is foss licensesapache, bsd, gpl, lgpl explained. Among the two gpl is the basis of open source software.
As a reminder, open source software licenses generally. The general public license has long been the preferred license for opensource businesses, but new analysis suggests that apache style licensing. The software freedom law center provides practical advice for developers about including permissively licensed source. See the license for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the license.
The build produces two sets of binaries one set that falls under the elastic. The apache software foundation asf, clearly say that forking some apache licensed code into your gpl project is illegal because then the apache software would have to be distributed under gplv3. The apache license, on the other hand, is favored by the big corporations for their open source projects. Compliance costs and the apache license apache openoffice. If you want to use a lax, permissive noncopyleft free software license, it is much better to use the modified bsd license, the x11 license or the expat license.
The apache license is a permissive free software license written by the apache software foundation asf. Most surveys indicate that the vast majority of open source projects use the mit license, the apache license, and the gpl or their variants. Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail. Tldrlegal software licenses explained in plain english. Gpl version 3 is designed to be compatible with two important licenses. An uninstaller allows you to remove vertrigo from hard disc.
A short guide to open source licenses smashing magazine. It is essentially identical to the x11 license, with an optional alternative way of providing license notices. So, for instance, the mit license grants users the right to deal in the software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, andor sell copies of the software. Mit license spot the differences due to the helpful visualizations at a glance category. In this blog we will start off by looking at two of the open source licenses we use at the hyve, apache 2. However, not being a lawyer, and actually not having read the whole license, i cant understand what. The mit license is the least restrictive license out there. Among the two gpl is the basis of open source software for programmers. In this article, we take a look at the difference between this two licenses. Jan 21, 20 apache is decent model when you have expertise and money, but do not have significant market share yet.
This policy provides licensing guidance to apache software foundation projects. The open source definition allows for further restrictions like price, type of contribution and origin of the contribution, e. This license has been superseded by the apache license, version 2. Comparison of free and opensource software licenses wikipedia. These licenses help us achieve our goal of providing reliable and longlived software products through collaborative open source software development. Apr 06, 2007 in the early days of the gplv3 revision process, compatibility with the apache license 2. Based on this page, i can see that only apache license 2. The free software foundation considers the apache license, version 2. In this article, we take a look at the difference between this two licenses to find out why. Apr 29, 2009 apache better than gpl for opensource business. Gnu lesser gpl and apache software licenses denver business. However, gplv3 software cannot be included in apache projects. The wordiness creates greater specificity about contributors obligations, which might help in. Common development and distribution license wikipedia.
If they have a licensing question, projects are asked to submit questions to the legal affairs committee jira space. You should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along with this program. The default license throughout the repository is apache license. The common understanding while i was working on apache code a while back was that you could incorporate bsd, mit, and similar licensed libraries but you could not do the same for gpl based licenses. The apache software license was based in large part on bsd and mit style licenses. The apache license has a similar philosophy to the mit, but uses more words. The apache license is a permissive open source software license so you can release your modified version of the apache licensed product under any license of your choice.
1168 1671 102 1625 988 1580 936 464 937 801 12 1181 1440 93 1416 981 388 759 934 1015 1467 183 507 1185 526 336 1113 122 198 418 1452 1087 124 1060 736 1223 345 79 421 759 1117 980